Most
likely you and other credit union managers have spent more
hours reading NCUA bulletins, NAFCU proposals and sitting in
more webinars in the past few weeks than you’d ever like to count. The “bail
out” of US Central and the corporate credit unions, as
we’ll call it, has many on edge. How much do you have to
pay? What will your bottom line look like to members? How will
you combat the media’s negative reports? What if a corporate
credit union actually failed – where will you shift your
drafts, ACH, etc?
No doubt the situation with the corporates has credit unions
uneasy about their future and the overall impact of the solution.
However, opportunity is born from such great challenges.
Credit unions are largely safe and secure; however, many credit
unions are failing, being liquidated or merging with other institutions.
These events were largely overshadowed by the media’s focus
on big banks, with understanding. It is hard to make the headlines
when Wachovia, an institution with assets greater than the entire
credit union industry, fails. Now that the corporates are in fear
of failing and the entire CU industry is being affected, the media
is starting to focus in on credit unions.
Many credit unions were founded after the Great Depression; a time
when banks were failing, unemployment was at an all time high,
the stock market crashed and people were seriously concerned about
their financial well-being (sound familiar?). Credit unions, each
serving a distinct field of membership, became a financial haven
to many consumers, providing opportunity and a sense of financial
security. The cooperative model brought benefits such as higher
savings yields, lower loan rates, and lower fees. However, the
current landscape is blurring these benefits and the credit union
difference needs to be reiterated through new means.
Before we examine the new opportunities, let’s first examine
the uniqueness of credit unions and the benefits routinely promoted.
With more and more credit unions switching to community charter institutions
or adding thousands of SEGs, the distinctive field of membership has been largely
blurred. This trend, designed to help institutions grow, has put credit unions
in the cross hairs of banks as they question how a community credit union differs
from a community bank. Furthermore, credit unions shed one of their single
most powerful marketing tools – exclusivity (which remains one of the
most persuasive tactics used by businesses).
The stock market decline not only eliminated a huge portion of cash available
in the system, it caused a change in operations by banks. Banks are required
a lower capital ratio than credit unions because banks can issue stock to gain
funds. When investors refuse to buy this stock (as seen currently), banks are
forced to gain deposits in the same fashion as credit unions. As a result,
many banks are offering deposit yields higher than credit unions; sometimes
nearly double credit unions’ yields. The “Deposit War”, as
we call it, is likely just beginning.
Credit unions are famous for great auto loans. Over the past
couple decades credit unions have gained ground in other loan
types, such as mortgages and unsecured loans. However, with the
sharp decline in borrowing, the lower demand is causing banks
to become very competitive with their loan rates. While the media
focuses on “banks” not lending, what they are largely
referring to is the big banks not lending to large businesses.
They are not referring to the local banks, which, like you, probably
have plenty to lend and are willing to do so.
The current economy has financial institutions looking to buffer
their financial statements in any manner possible. Non-interest
income, specifically fee income, has become the center of focus.
Bankrate.com’s latest “Checking Fees” study
of banks revealed the average NSF fee is $28.95. Glancing at
25 credit unions’ fee schedules, we noticed over half were
at or over this average.
The above points reiterate the landscape is changing. Opportunity
cannot be found by solely relying on the same 4 or 5 bullet points
of difference used for decades. This will become especially true
if the media focuses its attention on the credit union industry. NCUA
mentioned some credit unions may fail as a result of the current
proposal, but that more would fail if no solution was provided.
So where is the opportunity?
The bank crisis caught people largely off guard, instilled panic
and used taxpayer money for the bail out. The lending practices
of many institutions were exposed and ultimately caused a great
mistrust in these larger institutions. Credit unions can use
these events to build trust and truly show their difference.
Upon NCUA’s final solution details being revealed in April,
you should be proactive and explain the corporate situation to
your members upfront. In simple fashion, detail how your credit
union will be impacted and ensure members their funds are insured.
Doing so will demonstrate your openness and respect for your
members. You may lose some deposits or members, but what if your
members are caught by surprise as were bank customers?
Furthermore, use this as an opportunity to reveal your true difference.
Because credit unions are not taxed and the industry overall
has a capital ratio of about 12-13%, government assistance is
unlikely. Credit unions should reiterate to their members (and
the general public) that as a large cooperative, the credit union
industry is able to identify and implement solutions to sustain
operations as an industry without a “bail out” from
taxpayers.
Being open with your members and the general public about the
situation is key to maintaining a positive reputation and building
trust. Identifying the industry’s ability to sustain
itself based upon the cooperative model upon which credit unions
were founded (without taxpayer money) may help credit
unions gain more positive awareness in general with both current
and potential members.
| President |